Loading...

PRP vs. GFC: Which Advanced Hair Restoration Treatment is Right for You?

Dr. Vidushi Jain, Dermatologist and Medical Head at Dermalinks

17-Feb-2025

PRP vs. GFC: Which Advanced Hair Restoration Treatment is Right for You?

Sorting the facts from the fads, according to an expert

Hair loss is a global problem that affects the lives of millions of people all over the world. With the advancement of medical science, non-surgical hair restoration treatment has gained prominence, and among them are Platelet-Rich Plasma (PRP) therapy and Growth Factor Concentrate (GFC) therapy. Both these treatments are based on the healing properties of the body for stimulating hair growth but in varying ways and degrees of efficacy. If you’re considering a regenerative hair treatment, here is an overview of PRP and GFC to help you make the correct decision.

Understanding PRP Therapy

Platelet-Rich Plasma (PRP) therapy is an established hair restoration technique where a small amount of the patient's blood is extracted, centrifuged to separate the platelet-rich plasma, and injected into the scalp. PRP contains growth factors that activate the hair follicles, promote hair regrowth, and improve thickness.

Key Facts of PRP Therapy:

  • Reasonable quantity of growth factors
  • Several sessions are required to get optimal results
  • Less costly compared to GFC therapy
  • Effective but the effects may take time to occur
  • Available and in demand

Understanding GFC Therapy

Growth Factor Concentrate (GFC) is the second generation of PRP that has been designed to harvest a greater percentage of growth factors from the patient's blood. The process minimises unwanted ingredients like white and red blood cells to produce a more concentrated and effective solution for hair regrowth. GFC, like PRP, is delivered via injection in an attempt to stimulate dormant follicles and grow new hair.

( Image Credits : Dr. Vidushi Jain )

Main Features of GFC Therapy

  • More concentrated factor than PRP
  • Less number of sessions required to see results
  • More expensive than PRP therapy
  • More rapid and localized effects
  • Less accessible than PRP

PRP vs. GFC: What's Best for You?

If you’re just beginning to notice thinning hair and prefer an affordable solution, PRP therapy might be the best solution.  But if you want a more intense treatment with faster results and can afford to spend a little extra, GFC therapy is the superior option.

The two treatments are surgery-free and require patience and dedication for visible results. A dermatologist or trichologist consultation will be able to recommend the best treatment depending on the type of your hair loss, scalp condition, and health status. Both GFC and PRP are newer hair regrowth procedures that hold vast promise for anyone suffering from baldness. Whether you have plans to get it all back, strategic planning of your treatment cycles and scalp care will be paramount to ensuring you get the best results in your quest for regrowing your hair.

Cover Credits: Pexels

GlobalSpa Related Blogs